Room to Roam for Mexican Wolves
Dear
Guardian,
In the late spring of 2004, a pioneering young Mexican wolf and
her mate staked out new territory on the western slope of New Mexico’s San
Mateo Mountains. The pair, two of the less than 50 Mexican wolves in
existence in the wild, preyed on the mountain range’s abundant elk and deer and
started a family—the San Mateo Pack—in their new home overlooking the Aldo
Leopold Wilderness to the west and the Rio Grande valley to the east.
The only problem for the newly formed San Mateo Pack is that
they settled outside an invisible and arbitrary boundary that the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service set determining where Mexican wolves may, and may not, live.
(Note: To receive our Executive Director’s blog in the future
please subscribe.)
The wolves bothered no one—not even the area’s few ranchers—but
still federal wolf bureaucrats trapped and relocated the pair in August 2004
and again in the summer of 2005 to an area within the arbitrary boundaries the
government designated as acceptable for Mexican wolves to inhabit. Sadly, one of those
translocations caused the death of their young pups.
Wolf scientists knew the boundary was arbitrary and recommended
over and over again that the boundary be removed and Mexican wolves be granted
the room to roam they need to fully recover as a species.
This January the Service updated its Mexican wolf regulations.
Finally heeding the wisdom of wolf ecologists, they removed the old boundary. Incredibly, the Service created another equally
arbitrary boundary (although encompassing a larger area) that once again limits
where Mexican wolves can live. As a point of reference, no other endangered
large carnivore, much less one of the most endangered ones, has a boundary for
where it can and cannot live.
That’s why earlier this month WildEarth Guardians, joined by
the New Mexico Wilderness Alliance and Friends of Animals, and represented by
our own attorneys and the Western Environmental Law Center filed a lawsuit in
federal court against the Service to overturn the artificial geographic limits,
and many other equally arbitrary and deeply flawed aspects of the new rule
governing Mexican wolf recovery in the American Southwest.
While geographic limits undermine wolf conservation the rule’s
newly designated artificial cap on the Mexican wolf population really gets my
blood to boil. At the 11th
hour in the agencies’ multi-year planning process, and with essentially no
opportunity for public input, the Service adopted a population cap of 300-325
wolves! At a time when the science is saying we need more wolves in many more
places why does the Service continue to come up with half measures based on
half-truths?
But the Service’s new Mexican wolf regulations get even
worse.
The new rule flagrantly ignores the Endangered Species Act’s
requirement that reintroduced, or “experimental” populations, that are
“essential” to the species survival in the wild be designated as “essential”
rather than the much less protective “non-essential” designation under the Act.
How can the only wild Mexican wolf population not be
essential to the species survival in the wild? It’s outrageous!
The Service cynically claims that animals in zoos and
breeding facilities somehow ensure the species’ survival even when the
Endangered Species Act requires that it make the determination of
“essential/non-essential” based on populations in the wild. That’s why, even
though thousands of people and dozens of environmental groups asked the agency
to consider the benefits of the “essential” designation when it completed its
Environmental Impact Statement, it ignored those pleas.
The more protective “essential” designation would mean that some
of the biggest threats to the Mexican wolf—such as coyote hunting, trapping,
livestock grazing permitted by the U.S. Forest Service and activities carried
out by the federal animal damage control agency—would be subject to greater
scrutiny.
Incredibly the original alpha female of the San Mateo Pack
is still alive, though her first mate was killed by a government trapper and
another was killed by a poacher.
She now roams the Mangas Mountains, with another mate, in
the northern portion of the Gila National Forest.
While the current, politically defined wolf recovery boundary
at Interstate-40—a mere 85 miles to her north—may no longer threaten her given
her age, it may well endanger her off-spring as they seek to reclaim their
historic homelands just as she and her mate once did.
George Santayana, the Spanish philosopher and essayist once
said: “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” The San
Mateo Pack’s story of tragedy, recovery, and resilience is history that we will
not forget.
That’s why we’re fighting in court to overturn the
artificial geographic boundary, the arbitrary population cap and the
“non-essential” designation—and other flaws in the Mexican wolf recovery
framework as well. We believe that the foundation for the recovery of the Mexican
wolf simply needs to be stronger. With
your voice, and ours, we’ll get there.
For the wild,
John Horning
Executive Director
WildEarth Guardians
jhorning@wildearthguardians.org
Share this message:
San Mateo Female photo credit: Mexican wolf Interagency Field Team