WildEarth Guardians Challenges Failure of Xcel Coal Plant to Safeguard Clean Air, Climate

Lawsuit Filed Against EPA to Overturn Air Pollution Permit for Pawnee Coal-fired Power Plant

Denver-WildEarth Guardians today filed suit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to overturn an air pollution permit allowing Xcel Energy to jeopardize clean air and a safe climate while operating the Pawnee coal-fired power plant.

“It’s time to rein in illegal air pollution from the Pawnee coal-fired power plant,” said Jeremy Nichols, Climate and Energy Program Director for WildEarth Guardians.  “This is about protecting our clean air and our climate from dirty energy.  This is about ensuring Xcel Energy respects laws that are in place to keep us safe and healthy.”

The lawsuit targets the failure of the EPA to respond to a petition filed by WildEarth Guardians in February of 2010. The petition called on the Administrator of the EPA in Washington, D.C. to overturn an air pollution operating permit issued by the State of Colorado over its failure to ensure the Pawnee plant complied with clean air laws. The EPA was required to respond to the petition within 60 days.

At issue are ongoing Clean Air Act violations at the Pawnee plant.  In 2002, the EPA notified Xcel Energy that the company had illegally modified the Pawnee plant without installing the best available pollution controls.  In a Notice of Violation, the EPA found, “Xcel violated and continues to violate [the] Clean Air Act...by constructing and operating modifications at the Pawnee Station...without the necessary permits and by constructing and operating without the application of BACT [Best Available Pollution Controls].”  This violation has yet to be resolved.

The Pawnee coal plant, located in Brush, Colorado, 90 miles northeast of Denver, is the fourth largest coal-fired power plant in Colorado and is a major source of air pollution under the Clean Air Act.  According to Xcel’s own data on file with the State of Colorado and EPA, every year the 550 megawatt plant releases:

    9,190,000 pounds of nitrogen oxide pollution-which forms smog and haze-as much as is released by more than 240,000 cars (according to the EPA, a car releases 38.2 pounds of nitrogen oxides).

    307,820 pounds of particulate pollution, which scars scenic landscapes and can trigger asthma attacks.

    40,600 pounds of hydrochloric acid, a toxic chemical.

    360 pounds of mercury-a potent neurotoxin.

    3,837,802 tons of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that is fueling global warming, nearly 5% of Colorado’s total greenhouse gas emissions.

The air pollution permit was issued to Xcel Energy under Title V of the Clean Air Act.  Under Title V, permits are issued by states, but citizens can petition the EPA to veto them if they fail to comply with the law, including if they fail to require sufficient monitoring of air pollution.  In the case of the Pawnee coal-fired power plant, the permit fails to ensure Xcel installs the best available pollution controls to remedy the violations identified by the EPA in 2002, and also fails to require sufficient monitoring of particulate matter to ensure compliance with established limits. 

The permit also entirely fails to keep global warming pollution in check as required by law. Carbon dioxide is considered an air pollutant under both the Clean Air Act and Colorado state law. Under state law, an air pollutant is considered to be “any gas...which is emitted into or otherwise enters the atmosphere.”

State regulations require any stationary source of air pollution that spews more than 250 tons per year of any pollutant regulated under state law to use the best available controls. Although the Pawnee coal plant emits more than 250 tons per year of carbon dioxide, the permit fails to ensure Xcel Energy uses the best available pollution controls to keep global warming pollution in check.

“No more breaks for dirty energy,” said Nichols.  “With our climate, our health, and our safety at stake, the State of Colorado can’t continue to shirk its legal duties.”

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

View the Lawsuit (PDF)


 

All active news articles